Cumbria County Council voted against the plan for a geological dump on 30th January 2013….That should have been an end to it..and without a “solution” for the nuclear waste it should also have been an end to new nuclear build. But the government says “we have a plan” never mind that the “plan” is diabolic dispersal of radioactive wastes to our geology (and to our air, to our sea, our land, even our DNA)
How Many Times Do We Have To Say NO ?
Government and local nuclear cheerleaders want to overturn this decision..by coming back with a new “process.”
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
If you have land near a road put up NO NUKE DUMP signs
Put up posters in Windows
No Nuke Dump! Stop Moorside!
Write letters to the press
Contact your Parish, District and Borough Councillors, urge them to let Government know WE ARE NOT A WILLING COMMUNITY! note part of the new process is to deny everyone apart from those receiving bribes in the form of “Community Partnership” monies from Nuclear Waste Services a voice ie only a small area of West Cumbria is now “allowed” to have a voice on this even though the plan would impact not only Cumbria but our neighbours accross the seam the Isle of Man, Scotland and Ireland.
Other people to contact include:
Lake District National Park Authority
https://www.lakedistrict.gov.uk/aboutus/contact-us
MPs https://members.parliament.uk/members/Commons?partyid=4&searchtext=region%3ACumbria
Join us on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/groups/radiationfreelakeland/
Link up with our other campaigns
https://www.lakesagainstnucleardump.com/
RADIATION FREE LAKELAND 
Tchernobyl Day
Sortir du Nucléaire Paris
Le 26 avril à 14h00
Manifestation déambulatoire départ Bastille place de l’arsenal
Click to access 2014-04-26_Tchernobyl-Day.pdf
#Nonukes #Fukushima #NUKES
Demand Professor Brian Cox to step down from serving the glaobal elite by wrting a to him here @ProfBrianCox http://www.apolloschildren.com
Pingback: Countering Capenhurst Issue 8 – August 2016 – Close Capenhurst
Conventional fission nuclear power – outdated – bad technology because of concurrent high radiological toxicity and risk of explosion – how many more Fukushimas do we need before the dangers of this obsolete nucelar technology become generally accepted ? At the moment, there are 160000 tonnes of high-level nuclear waste around the World that has to be store safely for many thousands of years. Thorium LFTR may be able to transmute this waste to make it less dangerous, but how many years will it take to transmute 160000 tonnes of high-level nuclear waste? Looking at the problem objectively, leaders around the World promoting conventional fission nuclear power are insane – despite academic decorations and prestige careers – it does not matter with such status – the issue is that continuing with conventional nuclear fission power is insane, mad, irresponsible to future generations, uneconomical. Why are our political leaders so utterly wedded to such dreadful technology? There are far better technologies now, including LENR that the Japanese demonstrated circa 7 years, so the USA et al. (i.e. oil cartel) used HAARP to cause a tsunami (invoking circa 3 Hz ionospheric resonance) to punish Japan. Quoting: “The love of money is the route of many kinds of evil” … “Vanity of vanity, all is vanity”. So madmen are just continuing to push conventional nuclear fission power for reasons of money and vanity; Judas sold Jesus for a few Gold coins – likewise, skimping on the design at Fukushima Dai’ichi will finish human life on Earth due to radioactive contamination. Our political leaders and industrialists are insane.
Could I become a member of Radiation Free Lakeland?
Dear Sarah, thanks for your message. Yes of course – We don’t have paid membership so RaFL is open to all but by signing up to this blog you will get updates on campaigning and actions and we do have a facebook page https://www.facebook.com/groups/radiationfreelakeland/ with many thanks Marianne