NuGen Admit Lying in Advert Published in Every Cumbrian Paper

NuGen the developers behind the diabolic Moorside proposal have been caught out lying to the public in a double page advert for the CONsultation.  If these companies who built the Fukushima nuclear plant don't know the difference between energy and electricity then why on earth should we believe the other lies that nuclear power is  "safe" and "low …

Continue reading NuGen Admit Lying in Advert Published in Every Cumbrian Paper

UK: Democracy Threatens the Existing Order; The Existing Order Threatens Democracy

Democracy and Nuclear ….increasingly clear that one must be ditched to have the other.

Mining Awareness +

The British government has long considered democracy a threat to “the existing order”. Recently, the UK Parliament voted to override county and local democracy, in order to facilitate the dumping of its nuclear waste on communities. On the 25 Mar 2015, Ayes were 277 and Noes 33, for the dumping of democracy, along with the nuclear waste. Already in 1984, Hilda Murrell spoke of the “inbuilt tendency to dictatorship”, as an outgrowth of the nuclear industry. Since no one in their right minds wants a nuclear waste dump near them, they must either send all nuclear waste to landfills, as they’ve started doing already, or force nuclear dumps on communities. Sending nuclear waste to landfills involves extermination of the inhabitants of the British Isles over time; the second involves the dumping of democracy.

The UK has a wonderful chance to vote in an anti-nuclear and pro-democracy government on the 7th…

View original post 1,485 more words

Windscale, Moorside, Sellafield Accident Impact-Fallout Map

Another excellent article from Mining Awareness…THANK YOU M.A! “Each of three proposed Moorside nuclear reactors is 6 times bigger than Windscale, and larger than Chernobyl.”

Mining Awareness +

The Chernobyl accident is an obvious example of how human failures when dealing with a modern technical system can have global consequences and also be a potential threat to what we like to think of as the unspoiled wilderness of the Arctic ” (Ahman, 1998)

The Windscale fire of 10 October 1957 was the worst nuclear accident in Great Britain’s history, ranked in severity at level 5 on the 7-point International Nuclear Event Scale.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windscale_fire Each of three proposed Moorside nuclear reactors is 6 times bigger than Windscale. They are bigger than the Chernobyl reactor.

In “Windscale fallout underestimated“, by Rebecca Morelle-BBC News, 6 October 2007, one finds a rare map of the Windscale fallout plume: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7030536.stm It seems have traveled about the same distance as the Chernobyl fallout.

Unable to find a Creative Commons or public domain map, we used the above map…

View original post 1,081 more words

Barrow Children Under the Shadow in the North in Trident Town

BAE, the biggest arms manufacturers in Europe plan to take over the education of Barrows' school children. Note: this is not inevitable - it can be stopped BAE do not take over until Sept ... Local Education Authorities, Councils and Services are being starved of cash so that the government can continue with its insane nuclear …

Continue reading Barrow Children Under the Shadow in the North in Trident Town

LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE: “Moorside will produce 7% of the UKs energy” RUBBISH!!

  Complaint on Moorside Advertorial  sent to the Advertising Standards Authority The more complaints sent in the better ... Radiation Free Lakeland have sent a complaint to the Advertising Standards Authority regarding the lie that Moorside would provide “7% of the UKs energy” “NuGen’s Moorside Project aims to provide approximately 7% of the UK’s current …

Continue reading LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE: “Moorside will produce 7% of the UKs energy” RUBBISH!!

Homicidal Japan Court Approves Restart of Nuclear Reactor by Dangerous Decade Volcano

Mining Awareness +

Although Sakurajima’s activity since 1955 has been characterized by frequent small eruptions, the volcano still poses a danger to the densely-populated surroundings. Roughly 7,000 years ago Sakurajima erupted with a volcanic explosivity index (VEI) of 6, equivalent to the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo“. (Emphasis added) http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/view.php?id=45388&eocn=image&eoci=morenh

Sakurajima is classified as a “Decade Volcano”, one of 17 volcanoes, worldwide, “identified by the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI) as being worthy of particular study in light of their history of large, destructive eruptions and proximity to populated areas“. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade_Volcano
Sakurajima by Krypton, CC-BY-SA-3.0 Sakurajima, 3 October 2009, Photo by Krypton, CC-BY-SA-3.0 via Wikipedia

Please tell me that this is a nightmare from which we will all shortly awaken and that it is not real:
UPDATE 1-Japan court approves restart of reactors in boost for Abe’s nuclear policy
Posted:Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:57:59 -0400
*…

View original post 732 more words

Cumbrian Based Fukushima Companies Lie About Energy Produced by Moorside Plan

Every paper this week in Cumbria has a double page spread about the plan to build 3 diabolic reactors on ancient green fields and hedgerows . The nuclear industry and their government cronies have done everything in their power to steamroller Cumbria down this vicious radioactive route.  But still that is not enough for them. …

Continue reading Cumbrian Based Fukushima Companies Lie About Energy Produced by Moorside Plan

Sending Highly Radioactive Waste to Landfills in the UK: Comment by 21 April; Vote 7 May

Mining Awareness +

The UK Magically Declares Highly Radioactive Waste Non Radioactive and Dustbins it throughout the Kingdom. This is not a joke. The amounts effectively declared “non-radioactive” (approx. 4000 Bq/kg) and sent to landfill are 6 x more radioactive than allowed for EU food (4 x greater than UK food rules; 40 x greater than Japanese rules) and allow 400 x more tritium (40,000 Bq/liter) than legally allowed in water. Clearly this will impact agriculture and drinking water. The becquerels will actually be much higher for fluffy things, which can be compacted, because this is based on volume and not weight. A small box which is 0.1m3 (47 cm x 47 cm x 47 cm) can hold up to 400,000 Becquerels (radioactive emissions per second). It is stated, in the definition of VLLW, that “Controls on disposal of this material, after removal from the premises where the wastes arose, are not…

View original post 4,346 more words

Not Fit for Purpose – The UK’s Low Level Radioactive Waste Strategy

Sent today to the UK Consultation of Low Level Radioactive Waste Strategy. The CONsultation  on dispersal of wastes to the environment can be emailed here:  NILLWStrategy@decc.gsi.gov.uk    by 21st April.  Send your opposition to dispersal of radioactive wastes and call for a moratorium on the dodgy concept of Decommissioning which has come to mean Dispersal. Nuclear …

Continue reading Not Fit for Purpose – The UK’s Low Level Radioactive Waste Strategy