This information has been sent out to press on numerous occasions. So far it has not been picked up. A letter (another one!!) has just been sent to the Secretary of State reiterating nuclear concerns re the coal mine and asking that he calls Cumbria County Council’s decision in.
A Nuclear Safety group based in the South Lakes have sent a ‘Nuclear Issues’ Call In letter to the Secretary of State over the Cumbrian Coal Mine
Radiation Free Lakeland’s Keep Cumbrian Coal in the Hole campaign has repeatedly delayed the start date of the Coal Mine. This delay has, say the nuclear safety group, been achieved by legal challenge with the help of lawyers Leigh Day. The nuclear safety group continue to challenge Cumbria County Council’s approval for the development which would see the first deep coal mine in the UK for decades.
The letter to the Secretary of State Robert Jenrick states : “We have written to you repeatedly on this and ask that you take all our previous representations and petitions into account when making your decision (to call the Council’s decision in for a public inquiry). We are writing to you now to remind you of our primary and most visceral concerns which relate to the close proximity of the coal mine to Sellafield and Long Lived “Historic” Nuclear Wastes.”
Spokesperson for Radiation Free Lakeland says “our concerns are that no-one is taking adequate notice of, or responsibility for the impact this mine would have both on the wastes at Sellafield and also on the reprocessing wastes that have been discharged over many decades and are now sitting on the Irish Sea bed directly under the area that West Cumbria Mining propose mine out. A massive void the size of Wastwater lake is proposed under the Cumbrian Mud Patch, this would lead to likely collapse of the Irish Sea bed. Our own commissioned report by Tim Deere-Jones has been vindicated with another report published more recently in Science of the Total Environment which includes findings from the Centre for Radiochemistry Research -The University of Manchester and Radiochemistry Unit -The University of Helsinki, Finland. Findings are that up to 90% of the plutonium discharged from Sellafield are likely to be sitting in the silts on the Cumbrian Mud patch along with a cocktail of other radionuclides. To mine underneath this area for any reason, let alone for unneeded coal, knowing that this is the case, is an act of premeditated murder no less than letting off a series of nuclear bombs.”
New Report Published under Creative Commons in Science of the Total Environment “Controls on anthropogenic radionuclide distribution in the Sellafield-impacted Eastern Irish Sea” Daisy Ray et al. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969720342893
Image under Creative Commons from the new report
Dear Secretary of State,
APPLICATION REFERENCE NUMBER 4/17/9007 – WEST CUMBRIA MINING
Please Call In Cumbria County Council’s Approval of Woodhouse Colliery Near Sellafield Under the Cumbrian Mud Patch
We have written to you repeatedly on this and ask that you take all our previous representations and petitions into account when making your decision.
We are writing to you now to remind you of our primary and most visceral concerns which relate to the close proximity of the coal mine to Sellafield and Long Lived “Historic” Nuclear Wastes.
“HIGH RISK OF LIQUEFACTION AT SELLAFIELD”
Sellafield is already at “high risk of liquefaction.” Local evidence at Rampside Nr Barrow shows that liquefaction can be caused by a minor geological event such as a 2.5 earthquake. Independent reports from geologists have shown that Sellafield is at “high risk of liquefaction.” With “permitted development” Cumbria County Council have already allowed the developers to carry out a four year drilling program of exploratory boreholes. This includes boreholes drilled through named faults near the Sellafield site at St Bees, the Nethertown and Rachel Fault. We have asked Tim Farron MP to ask on our behalf exactly exactly who is responsible for ensuring the integrity of faults and preventing induced seismicity near Sellafield. It is not clear from the Freedom of Information questions directed at the Office for Nuclear Regulation, the Environment Agency, the British Geological Society and others just who is taking responsibility for the integrity of the faulted geology surrounding the Sellafield plant.
Absraction of groundwater from the Byerstead Fault as the primary freshwater use for Woodhouse Colliery would also significantly impact hydrology and geology. West Cumbria Mining refuse to say how much ground water from the Byerstead Fault they would be using on site. Following Freedom of Information requests from ourselves we have been told that the Office for Nuclear Regulation, the British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency and United Utilities have had no correspondence with West Cumbria Mining on how much groundwater would be abstracted from the Byerstead Fault at peak production of the mine. Cumbria County Council has (as far as we know) not asked how much water WCM would be abstracted from the Byerstead Fault. There has also been no inquiry or research into the likely hydrological and groundwater impacts of abstraction of groundwater from Byerstead Fault for use on site.
OUTLYING PLANNING ZONE – WOODHOUSE COLLIERY AND SELLAFIELD
We note that The Office for Nuclear Regulation says the mine would lie just 600 metres outside of the 7.4 km circle drawn around Sellafield for which the ONR is stated to be responsible. Cumbria County Council have not questioned exactly who should be accountable for mining induced seismicity near Sellafield. This is despite the new Outlying Planning Zone around Sellafield being up to 50 km The coal mine is well within this zone at just 8km away.
The Head of Cumbria County Council Cllr Stewart Young stated in September 2020 “”This new concept of an Outlying Planning Zone is new. The zone is determined by kilometres from the centre of the Sellafield site. It takes you way beyond the boundaries of Copeland, showing that other areas of Cumbria would also be affected by a serious incident. It includes BAE and the docks at Barrow. So, the implications of an accident are so significant for the whole county. It is a responsibility that sits then with Cumbria County Council as well as Barrow, Copeland and Allerdale. This is an important piece of work.”
The new OPZ regulations allow for a transitional period and a plan has been agreed with the Office for Nuclear Regulation allowing the council to prepare the plans before November 21 this year. Sellafield’s OPZ is the largest in the United Kingdom and there is reported to be a substantial amount of work being undertaken to identify vulnerable premises and infrastructure in the zone. The County Council has made no reference to the coal mine being a potentially hazardous influencing element within the Sellafield OPZ.
COLLAPSE OF THE IRISH SEA BED – AND THE SELLAFIELD/CUMBRIAN MUD PATCH
The developers and Cumbria County Council do acknowledge the risk of subsidence. To attempt to mitigate against collapse of the largely onshore part of the mine it is proposed that up to 25% of the voids should be backfilled with cement paste. However the enormous void the size of Wastwater Lake which is proposed to be mined out under the offshore Cumbrian Mud Patch would not be backfilled. Collapse of the Irish Sea bed above the mine would inevitably cause subsidence and resuspension of the decades of radioactive wastes in the silt of the named Sellafield/Cumbrian Mud Patch (offshore of Sellafield’s discharge pipelines). The discharge of aqueous radioactive wastes both under authorisation and accidental, has taken place from the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing site to the Irish Sea since 1952. “Low level” liquid effluent including very long lived wastes such as plutonium was discharged into the Irish Sea via pipelines extending seawards 2.5 km from the high water mark and ending 20 m below the surface of the water (Gray et al., 1995). The idea was to “dilute and disperse.” This has not happened as planned. Much of the decades of nuclear wastes from reprocessing spent nuclear fuel from all of the UKs nuclear reactors and many oversea’s reactors has ended up in the very same silt that the Woodhouse Colliery would lie beneath. Our own citizen science sampling of Cumbrian beaches over the years has shown that radioactive wastes are already contaminating Cumbrian beaches. This ongoing beach contamination by Sellafield’s ‘historic’ and continuing discharges is already an intolerable nuclear waste problem with no solution. A coal mine induced collapse of the Irish Sea bed would result in a tsunami of decades worth of churned up nuclear wastes being chucked into the water column to be dumped on the beaches of Cumbria …Scotland…Isle of Man….Ireland….and even the Arctic
ROSATOM, NEW CENTURY MEDIA AND THE COAL MINE
Finally in a darkly beyond satire twist the reprocessing of spent uranium fuel at Sellafield was in order to produce plutonium for the atomic bomb to ‘protect us from the Russian menace’. The decades of discharged wastes including plutonium wastes from this spent fuel reprocessing are largely lying on the Cumbrian Mud Patch. It is beyond reckoning that the Russian nuclear defense state program “Rosatom” has the exact same PR company called New Century Media as the coal mine developers who want to mine out large voids under the nuclear wastes on the sea bed. The ‘historic’ nuclear wastes are long- lived and present a real and present danger to us all should they be resuspended into the water column and back to shores via collapse of the Irish Sea bed. Also beyond reckoning is the fact that the CEO of the coal mine we are so very concerned about regarding nuclear impacts should have been appointed to the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management. CoRWM are tasked with the thorny problem of what to do with nuclear waste. Liquefaction of the Sellafield site and the resuspension of nuclear wastes from the Irish Sea bed would be the ultimate solution. Sellafield would do what it was originally designed to do- to be an ultimate destroyer of all biological life on planet earth.
This is not just about a coal mine – and for that reason the decision by Cumbria County Council must be called in for a public inquiry.
Keep Cumbrian Coal in the Hole – a Radiation Free Lakeland campaign
Outline Planning Zone – up to 50 miles from Sellafield
Nightmare Coal Mine Near Sellafield
The Barrow-in-Furness Earthquake of 15 February 1865: Liquefaction from a Very Small Magnitude Event
R. M. W. Musson
pure and applied geophysics
Shocking state of world’s riskiest nuclear waste site
Huge pools of mystery sludge, leaking silos and risk of explosions: Sellafield needs help, but the UK government has just sacked the firm running the clean-up
Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22530053-800-shocking-state-of-worlds-riskiest-nuclear-waste-site/#ixzz6btMFnAVz
The susceptibility of glacigenic deposits to liquefaction under seismic loading conditions: a case study relating to nuclear site characterization in West Cumbria
Martin Cross, Anass Attya and David J. A. Evans
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 62, 116-132, 18 September 2018
WCM: WOODHOUSE COLLIERY PROPOSAL RADIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS of POTENTIAL SEABED SUBSIDENCE,SEISMICITY
Published on Jun 11, 2020
A briefing paper by Tim Deere-Jones. WEST CUMBRIA MINING: WOODHOUSE COLLIERY PROPOSAL RADIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS of POTENTIAL SEABED SUBSIDENCE SEISMICITY & “FAULT RE-ACTIVATION” beneath The CUMBRIAN MUD PATCH: INDUCED BY “MASS REMOVAL”, RAPID EXTRACTION & VOID SPACE CREATION.
Discharges to the environment from the Sellafield site, 1951-1992. J Gray, S R Jones, A D Smith
Office for Nuclear Regulation remit extends to 7.4km from Sellafield – the coal mine would be 8km i.e. 600 metres outside the ONRs ‘remit’.
Cumbria County Council – Subsidence/Seismic Conditions on West Cumbria Mining Planning Application. There is no mention of mitigation of resuspension of nuclear wastes from the Cumbrian Mud Patch or induced Seismicity near Sellafield. West Cumbria Mining would “self monitor’
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS
West Cumbria Mining Abstraction from Byerstead Fault – Correspondence with Environment Agency
Responsibility for Discharged Radioactive Wastes on Cumbrian Mud Patch
Integrity of the Cumbrian Mud Patch
Who is Responsible for the Radioactive Wastes on the Cumbrian Mud Patch