STOP MOORSIDE – Petition

Stop Moorcide
Stop Moorcide

A petition has been set up to STOP MOORSIDE, described by the industry as “the biggest nuclear development in Europe”  Despite having no solution to the problem of nuclear waste our government is hell bent on trashing a large swathe of Cumbria in order to build new nuclear reactors. To quote Michael Meacher MP: “We need new nuclear like we need a hole in the head!”

…  Please sign the petition and share widely.

STOP MOORSIDE

The petition says:

We urge David Cameron and the leaders of Europe to scrap plans for Moorside. The UK Government is planning to sell a vast area of Cumbria to the same companies responsible for the Fukushima disaster, so that they can build new nuclear reactors. Please don’t risk the safety of Europe by turning Cumbria into a nuclear sacrifice zone.

Why is this important?

Cumbria already has Sellafield. The Sellafield site has the biggest amount of radioactivity on the planet. A major accident involving the liquid high level waste tanks would have catastrophic consequences and make the area uninhabitable for many generations. The area around the Sellafield site should be an untouchable buffer zone to:
a) provide a measure of safety for surrounding towns and villages
b) to accommodate the documented leakage of radiation from the Sellafield site into groundwater.
c) to minimise the target area for terrorist attack (instead of doubling it)

Instead of honouring a beautiful wildlife diverse landscape bought by the public purse and guaranteeing a buffer zone around Sellafield the UK government are planning to sell off a vast area. The land stretches to the villages of Beckermet, Braystones and Calder Bridge. Not only this but the companies who are being wooed to buy the land are the very same companies responsible for Fukushima.

“The Moorside Project” is being promoted by NUGEN a company 60% owned by Toshiba.

Toshiba’s proposed three new reactors are AP1000s. These are the next generation of the same old uranium burning technology. The difference is that these reactors burn the uranium for longer and harder. The resulting radioactive wastes are much hotter and have to be cooled for decades longer. The NDA have told Radiation Free Lakeland that the fresh water resource for cooling is “a matter for the operators.” Currently Sellafield uses over 4 million gallons of water daily to abstracted from Wastwater, the River Ehen, the River Calder and boreholes in the area. Sellafield stopped producing electricity in 2003.

The elephant in the room is of course Toshiba’s track record in nuclear safety. Toshiba supplied the steam generator, architecture and reactor for Fukushima reactors numbers 3 and 5 Hitachi (merged with Toshiba) supplied the reactor, steam generator and architecture for Fukushima reactor no 4.

The beautiful wildlife diverse land:
https://mariannewildart.wordpress.com/2014/08/10/stop-moorcide/
Contaminated Groundwater – Sellafield

Nuclear Reactor Maps – Fukushima – Daiichi

http://nuctrans.org/Nuc_Trans/locations/daiichi/daiichi.htm

Hitachi, Toshiba and GE Merge Nuclear Operations

http://www.modernpowersystems.com/news/newshitachi-toshiba-and-ge-merge-nuclear-fuel-operations

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/how-can-the-nuclear-industry-profit-from-nucl/blog/44192/

Escalating cost of ‘clean up’

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/feb/11/sellafield-consortium-cost-clean-up
Not enough Fresh water to cool new build wastes
https://mariannewildart.wordpress.com/2011/11/18/why-has-the-wettest-place-in-england-not-got-enough-freshwater/

http://enenews.com/watch-top-economist-nuclear-power-is-over-frankly-i-think-from-a-business-perspective-its-over-i-think-its-over-video

 

 

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “STOP MOORSIDE – Petition

    • many thanks! The more the better. The only comments in the media are to say what a fantastic thing Moorside would be. I get the feeling the lack of media attention on this is (apart from triumphalism) is being deliberately orchestrated to try to get the plans well underway before a momentum of opposition can be built up. They can try but we will resist!!!!!

  1. There is no future for nuclear, why build this plant next to Sellafield when there is no infrastructure to get the power into the grid. If they really must build such a high risk plant then at least build it near to the right infrastructure such as Heysham or Hartlepool. Better still build conventional plants with better pollution control. Roy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s